--e89a8f2349e1434a8404c04100e4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Tr=FCg wrote: > > I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DBu= s > > interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are > > supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces... > > Great. thanks. > Can't we just break binary compatibility for 4.10. Just this once? @Sebastian: Do you really want to have to deprecate the QueryServiceClient as mentioned in [1]? I rather not have stuff like that lying around in Nepomuk2. I'd like to not have to make hasty decisions right now (before 4.9). Plus, it's not like you'll have to recompile a lot of stuff. The only things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are nepomuk-kde-config and nepomuk-kde-kio. [1] http://community.kde.org/Projects/Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_framework= s > hugs and kisses > > /Sune > > > > > On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote: > >> On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa wrote: > >>> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in > >>> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to break a lot > of > >>> things. > >> > >> NACK. > >> > >> this is a completely no go. > >> > >> /Sune > >> > >> > > > > --=20 Vishesh Handa --e89a8f2349e1434a8404c04100e4 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 1:29 AM, Sune Vu= orela <nospam@vuorela.dk> wrote:
On 2012-05-17, Sebastian Tr=FCg <trueg@kde.org> wrote:
> I think we can manage BC. The only thing that would be hard are the DB= us
> interfaces. But since nepomuk-core contains client libs which are
> supposed to be used instead of the dbus interfaces...

Great. thanks.

Can't we just break binar= y compatibility for 4.10. Just this once?

@Sebastian: Do you really = want to have to deprecate the QueryServiceClient as mentioned in [1]? I rat= her not have stuff like that lying around in Nepomuk2. I'd like to not = have to make hasty decisions right now (before 4.9).

Plus, it's not like you'll have to recompile a lot of stuff. Th= e only things that depend on nepomuk-core right now are nepomuk-kde-config = and nepomuk-kde-kio.

[1] http://community.kde.org/Projects= /Nepomuk/Irc_meeting_nepomuk_frameworks


hugs and kisses

/Sune

>
> On 05/17/2012 09:19 PM, Sune Vuorela wrote:
>> On 2012-05-17, Vishesh Handa <m= e@vhanda.in> wrote:
>>> @Packagers: We will not be maintaining binary compatibility in=
>>> nepomuk-core. At least not for KDE 4.10. We still need to brea= k a lot of
>>> things.
>>
>> NACK.
>>
>> this is a completely no go.
>>
>> /Sune
>>
>>
>




--
Vishesh Handa

--e89a8f2349e1434a8404c04100e4--