[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: Adept 3 translation
From:       "=?UTF-8?Q?V=C3=ADt_Pel=C4=8D=C3=A1k?=" <v.pelcak () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-10-24 13:26:47
Message-ID: a27fbc3f0810240626h6ef23accjf7911b90e22215eb () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I can't quite agree.

I do believe, that web interface would help. Not that it would be only
option, but additional.

Why? It would help with collaboration. Button "translate this app"
could be put into any KDE app and would point to KDE web interface
regardless distribution. Anyone could translate and then admins would
approve or repair.

Why not put this into life? It is much easier than searching for po
file, translating, searching for email address where to send it ....

Not every teacher of language (or any other person particularly
skillful in languages) can do this. It isn't good to prefer people,
who can do this above those who cannot, but in return are better in
translating.

It would make need for launchpad lower (just for distro specific
things) as many Ubuntu translators teams prefer cooperation with
upstream above launchpad.

2008/10/24 Frederik Schwarzer <schwarzerf@gmail.com>:
> On Friday 24 October 2008 14:49:17 Kevin Donnelly wrote:
>> On Friday 24 October 2008 12:43, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
>> > What problem?
>>
>> Er ... the fact that there is an alternative workflow in Rosetta?  Did you
>> read the rest of the thread?
>
> Yes, there is an alternative workflow in Rosetta.
> So? Did it prove to be better, more accepted by anyone or the next
> logical evolutionary step? I don't think so.
>
> If KDE had put a web interface in place a few years ago, the situation
> would be similar. The problem is not that KDE does not have one but that
> the one Cannonical has doesn't work properly.
>
> Regards
>



-- 
Vit Pelcak
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]