[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: to  stable/l10n-kde4 or not, that's the question
From:       Chusslove Illich <caslav.ilic () gmx ! net>
Date:       2008-01-07 17:13:57
Message-ID: 200801071814.00877.caslav.ilic () gmx ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


>> [: Albert Astals Cid :]
>> a) Create stable/l10n-kde4 now and make it process messages of KDE 4.0.x
>> and make trunk/l10n-kde4 process KDE 4.1 messages
>
> [: Pino Toscano :]
> I'm more for this option, as:
> - teams aiming for inclusion in KDE 4.1 could continue working towards
> that
> - extracting messages (and generating documentation) early could make us
> catch and fix l10n/i18n errors not at the beta/freeze/latest days
> [...]

I also had in mind these two points in favor of (a), especially the second
one.

However, don't count this as my full support of (a), given that the
otherwise valid issues which (b) addresses have (hopefully) became
irrelevant in my language's new workflow. Say, weak-support for (a) :)

-- 
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
Serbian KDE translation team

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]