[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    Re: to  stable/l10n-kde4 or not, that's the question
From:       Luciano Montanaro <mikelima () cirulla ! net>
Date:       2008-01-07 16:09:22
Message-ID: 200801071709.23045.mikelima () cirulla ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

Il Monday 07 January 2008 17:00:16 Pino Toscano ha scritto:
> Alle lunedì 07 gennaio 2008, Albert Astals Cid ha scritto:
> > 	a) Create stable/l10n-kde4 now and make it process messages of KDE 4.0.x
> > and make trunk/l10n-kde4 process KDE 4.1 messages
>
> I'm more for this option, as:
> - teams aiming for inclusion in KDE 4.1 could continue working towards that
> - extracting messages (and generating documentation) early could make us
> catch and fix l10n/i18n errors not at the beta/freeze/latest days
> - (really minor) it could reflect what was did previously, aka an l10n
> branch for the "stable" serie (now being 4.0.x), and another one for the
> "unstable" one (4.1)
>
> Of course, this has the problem that in case teams working on both branch
> should take care of merging "stable" translations when they switch to
> the "unstable", or at least keeping them both in sync.

There is also solution c: a compromise where we keep the translation on 
trunk/l10n-kde4 for 4.0.1 and then move it to the branch. This way we could 
keep us translators focused on the 4.0 translation for another month or so, 
and then each team could decide if continuing focusing on the stable branch, 
or start working on head too.

Luciano 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]