[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-i18n-doc
Subject:    [Fwd: Re: How are conflicts between rosetta and upstream translations
From:       Krzysztof Lichota <krzysiek () lichota ! net>
Date:       2006-07-21 11:49:22
Message-ID: 44C0BF42.8030600 () lichota ! net
[Download RAW message or body]


Forwarding to KDE i18n doc as it seems important.
Looks like the Rosetta issue is getting tougher.
For me the only reasonable thing to do is to drop all complaints about
translations from Ubuntu/Kubuntu users with reply "Ubuntu is not supported".
This means also the text in "About translation" box should not refer to
my team page as basically we are NOT translating this app, it is done by
someone in Rosetta, out of our control.

	Krzysztof Lichota (Polish team coordinator)


-------- Wiadomość oryginalna --------
Temat: Re: How are conflicts between rosetta and upstream translations
resolved?
Data: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 13:29:01 +0200
Nadawca: Sebastian Heinlein <glatzor@ubuntu.com>
Adresat: ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com
Odniesienia: <44C09C0B.6000602@fys.uio.no>

Am Freitag, den 21.07.2006, 11:19 +0200 schrieb Åsmund Skjæveland:
> We've had a few minor issues with bad Norwegian translations in Rosetta, 
> and at least in one case the upstream translation was apparently 
> overridden. So I'm wondering: If a string is first translated in Rosetta, 
> then in upstream, which takes precedence? I'm assuming that the upstream 
> translation is imported regularly.

The Rosetta one has got the higher priority. We had similar issues with
the German translation. Basically this can currently be solved by only
allowing people, who you trust and who act in a responsible way, to
commit changes into Rosetta.

Regards,

Sebastian


-- 
ubuntu-translators mailing list
ubuntu-translators@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-translators


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]