[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    RE: reason behind fno-exceptions?
From:       "Jonathan Belson" <jon () witchspace ! com>
Date:       2001-07-31 9:37:51
[Download RAW message or body]

> On Tuesday 31 July 2001 10:16, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> 
> > Oh, then its even worse. I'd never attempt to use C for any serious work.
> > Its the same with Perl btw. It might be nice for a hack between getting up
> > and having breakfast, but not when it comes to larger projects. I can only
> > laugh about those poor people who have to reimplement the virtual-method /
> > method paradigm with cpp tricks and similiar just because their poor
> > language has no support for such fundamental principles. If I want real
> > masturbation I use assembler, not C.
> 
> Please don't let this thread become a C vs. C++ fight. I've really seen 
> enough of them in usenet.

From the first paragraph, it looks more like a GTK+ verses QT fight 8^)
Be a bit one-sided on this list.


--
C-YA
Jon

<http://www.witchspace.com>

 
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]