[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Why we have created the KDE League
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2000-11-22 21:42:16
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 22 November 2000 21:33, Raffaele Sandrini wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 22. November 2000 18.05 schrieb Michael Brade:
> > On Wednesday 22 November 2000 17:30, Chris Schlaeger wrote:
> > > Hi developers, translators, doc-writers and artists!
> > >
> > > I just returned from Las Vegas  where we announced the creation
> > > of the KDE League. Since  I was involved in setting it up  and
> > > was present at the  initial board meeting  as well  as at  the
> > > press  conference, I'm probably a good candidate to tell  you a
> > > little bit more about the KDE League and it's purposes.
> >
> > Hey, this was really nice to read!! Thanks a lot for that
> > enlightening explanation of the KDE League. May KDE now konquer the
> > remaining 95% of the world ;-)
> >
> > Ciao,
> >   Michael
> 
> Yeah it's good to hear that. But my question is: Is it nescessary to 
> "coquer" the rest of the 95%? I mean, we don't have any profit if we 
> have 100%. I make this for alsolutly FUN. It doesn't interrest me how 
> mnay other people use this. The main part is, that we have fun and 
> aenjoiable time in our group - the developpers of KDE!!
> Of course it _is_ nice to hear that many other people use our stuff, 
> but that won't (hopefully) get us away from our KDE-Way...

Well, for sure I would have much less fun doing it if nobody was
using KDE, and if everytime I saw a linux machine somewhere, it
was running something else.  ... which is not the case currently !!! :)

-- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/~david/, http://www.konqueror.org/
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today
See http://www.kde.org/kde1-and-kde2.html for how to set up KDE 2

>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]