[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Documentation standard ??
From:       Michael Koch <m_koch () bigfoot ! de>
Date:       1999-07-07 16:10:00
[Download RAW message or body]

> >We need to decide this. When the pre-2.0-libs (1.89) are shipped, there should
> >be a HTML-documentation included or as extra tgz or whatever. Thats for
> >developers switching to KDE-2.0 programming. Different documentation tools used
> >in the libs are very bad.
> 
> As we used kdoc until now, and most of the headers are kdocifies, we should of
> course keep using kdoc IMO. 

Yes, keeping KDOC is IMHO the best solution.

Mirko, can you convert the docu-comments to KDOC2 ? Or should I do this ?

Michael Koch

KDE fan, enthusiast and developer
projects: Katabase and KImageShop
writing documentation of KOM/OP

student of computer science at
university of applied sciences
Darmstadt, Germany

koch@kde.org
m_koch@bigfoot.de
mkoch@mail.riednet.wh.tu-darmstadt.de
http://www.riednet.wh.tu-darmstadt.de/~mkoch

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]