[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Documentation standard ??
From:       Michael Koch <m_koch () bigfoot ! de>
Date:       1999-07-07 15:41:45
[Download RAW message or body]

Am Mit, 07 Jul 1999 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
> Michael Koch wrote:
> > 
> > > >
> > > Well, I like to have the documentation in the headers.
> > 
> > Well, the documentation is in the headers, but some people (like me) want to
> > have HTML- or TEX-Documentation of the API. Thatīs why Iīm using kdoc every day.
> > 
> Well, I was refering to the way doxygen does it. There most stuff is in
> the sources.

Ah, I see, another concept.

We need to decide this. When the pre-2.0-libs (1.89) are shipped, there should
be a HTML-documentation included or as extra tgz or whatever. Thats for
developers switching to KDE-2.0 programming. Different documentation tools used
in the libs are very bad.


Ciao,
Michael

--
Michael Koch

KDE fan, enthusiast and developer
projects: Katabase and KImageShop
writing documentation of KOM/OP

student of computer science at
university of applied sciences
Darmstadt, Germany

koch@kde.org
m_koch@bigfoot.de
mkoch@mail.riednet.wh.tu-darmstadt.de
http://www.riednet.wh.tu-darmstadt.de/~mkoch

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]