[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Documentation standard ??
From:       Reginald Stadlbauer <reggie () troll ! no>
Date:       1999-07-07 16:58:57
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, 07 Jul 1999, Michael Koch wrote:
>Am Mit, 07 Jul 1999 schrieb Stephan Kulow:
>> Michael Koch wrote:
>> > 
>> > > >
>> > > Well, I like to have the documentation in the headers.
>> > 
>> > Well, the documentation is in the headers, but some people (like me) want to
>> > have HTML- or TEX-Documentation of the API. Thatīs why Iīm using kdoc every day.
>> > 
>> Well, I was refering to the way doxygen does it. There most stuff is in
>> the sources.
>
>Ah, I see, another concept.
>
>We need to decide this. When the pre-2.0-libs (1.89) are shipped, there should
>be a HTML-documentation included or as extra tgz or whatever. Thats for
>developers switching to KDE-2.0 programming. Different documentation tools used
>in the libs are very bad.

As we used kdoc until now, and most of the headers are kdocifies, we should of
course keep using kdoc IMO. 

--
Reggie

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]