[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Porting tutorials over to KF5
From:       Albert Astals Cid <aacid () kde ! org>
Date:       2015-09-28 21:39:19
Message-ID: 3399421.LY8bvYgNTA () xps
[Download RAW message or body]

El Diumenge, 27 de setembre de 2015, a les 14:08:21, Juan Carlos Torres va 
escriure:
> On Sunday, September 20, 2015 10:41:43 PM RISHABH GUPTA wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 20, 2015 at 10:08 PM, Albert Astals Cid <aacid@kde.org> wrote:
> > > El Dissabte, 19 de setembre de 2015, a les 09:55:17, Juan Carlos Torres
> > > va
> > > 
> > > escriure:
> > > > Greetings,
> > > > 
> > > > I've started porting some of the "Basics of KDE 4 Programming"
> > > > tutorials
> > > > over to KF5 code[1] just to get the ball rolling on updating our docs.
> > > 
> > > They
> > > 
> > > > are basically just a direct port of the code found in the main
> > > > tutorials,
> > > > with some annotations and references to porting guides or API docs.
> > > 
> > > Who is the target of these tutorials?
> > > 
> > > I understand it's newbies. If it's for newbies, i think the notes about
> > > "
> > > no
> > > more KApplication" and stuff add confusion instead of clarification,
> > > newbies
> > > don't care how it used to be coded, they just want to learn how to code.
> > > 
> > > What do you think?
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > >   Albert
> > >   
> > > > Admittedly, I went in half blind since I'm not all that familiar with
> > > > development myself. It was for both learning and documenting that
> > > 
> > > process.
> > > 
> > > > The KIO stuff in Saving and Loading was particularly tricky and I'm
> > > > not
> > > > completely sure I did it correctly (It only works with local files,
> > > > for
> > > > one).
> > > > 
> > > > Hoping someone could give those a look and make the necessary
> > > 
> > > corrections.
> > > 
> > > > And maybe then we can fill it up with more meat like the KDE 4
> > > > versions.
> > > > There are still a lot of stuff in Techbase that probably need dusting
> > > > up
> > > > but I had to start from the beginning and the easiest ones. ;)
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 1.
> > > > https://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/First_program/KF5
> > 
> > According to the frameworks porting note
> > 
> >  https://community.kde.org/Frameworks/Porting_Notes#Message_Box
> > 
> > Kmessage box is no longer a class its  a namespace and all the function
> > have been either moved to kdelibs4support as kmessagebox_queued.h or to
> > kwidgetsaddons as kmessagebox.h,so i guess instead of including
> > kmessagebox
> > we will have to include the above mentioned files .Correct me i am wrong.
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for the response and pardon for the late reply.
> 
> Yes, it's a namespace for static functions, so the static function
> questionYesNo() is under KMessageBox. It still needs kmessagebox.h to be
> included because that is where the functions are defined. But it links to
> KF5::WidgetAddons (in CMakeLists.txt).
> 
> Unless I got that wrong too. :)

Yeah KMessageBox is good.

Cheers,
  Albert

> 
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe
> >> <<


>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]