[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE Development with Mono/C#
From:       "Daniel Salas Rodriguez" <quicksilverphoenix () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-12-01 0:35:27
Message-ID: 200480c60811301635s37eb0176l3cc11477eb6ff243 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]

[Attachment #4 (text/plain)]

2008/11/30 Matthias Burtscher <matthias.burtscher@gmx.at>

> (...)
> But I am wondering why there is no approach to bring new technologies
> like Mono into KDE. I think it would be a much more developer friendly
> and also faster and cleaner way to build applications. And I think that
> most of you - who know the concept behind Mono/.Net - agree with this.


Mono in my opinion is not a new technology, It's just a bad copy of .NET.
That will make .NET the new technology.


> (...)
>

2008/11/30 Alexis Ménard <menard@kde.org>

> (...)
>
> *not completly neutral*
> Another point is that the innvation in Qt is more faster than Mono.
>  (...)


Totally agree on that.


Besides... According to Wikipedia's information (Which I don't
tend to rely much on it) only Novell's customers are the only
ones that Microsoft agreed that won't be suing around for
using Mono/.NET.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_(software)#Mono_and_Microsoft.E2.80.99s_patents

I don't know if KDE developers using Mono or that
implement it in KDevelop would be covered as 'Novel Users'

Regards.

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2008/11/30 Matthias Burtscher <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:matthias.burtscher@gmx.at">matthias.burtscher@gmx.at</a>&gt;</span><br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt \
0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> (...)<br>
But I am wondering why there is no approach to bring new technologies<br>
like Mono into KDE. I think it would be a much more developer friendly<br>
and also faster and cleaner way to build applications. And I think that<br>
most of you - who know the concept behind Mono/.Net - agree with \
this.</blockquote><div><br>Mono in my opinion is not a new technology, It&#39;s just \
a bad copy of .NET.<br>That will make .NET the new technology.<br><br> \
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br> \
(...)<br></blockquote><div><br>2008/11/30 Alexis Ménard <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a \
href="mailto:menard@kde.org">menard@kde.org</a>&gt;</span><br></div><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt \
0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> (...)<br><br>*not completly neutral*<br>Another point \
is that the innvation in Qt is more faster than \
Mono.<br>&nbsp;(...)</blockquote><div>&nbsp;</div><div>Totally agree on \
that.<br></div></div><br><br>Besides... According to Wikipedia&#39;s information \
(Which I don&#39;t <br> tend to rely much on it) only Novell&#39;s customers are the \
only <br>ones that Microsoft agreed that won&#39;t be suing around for <br>using \
Mono/.NET.<br><br><a \
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_(software)#Mono_and_Microsoft.E2.80.99s_patent \
s">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mono_(software)#Mono_and_Microsoft.E2.80.99s_patents</a><br>
 <br>I don&#39;t know if KDE developers using Mono or that <br>implement it in \
KDevelop would be covered as &#39;Novel Users&#39;<br><br>Regards.<br><br><br>



>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]