[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Reason for both .local and .Trash?
From:       Lexual <floss () lex ! hider ! name>
Date:       2007-06-18 4:17:51
Message-ID: 200706181417.51612.floss () lex ! hider ! name
[Download RAW message or body]

On Monday 18 June 2007 14:11:52 Lexual wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It has long bugged me that gnome/gtk has "trash" files in ~/.Trash and that
> kde/qt put these files in ~/.local?
>
> What is the reason for having 2 differing solutions to one simple problem?
>
> Is there any particular technical advantages betweens these two approaches?
>
> Is there any reason why kde4 can't have a better unified solution?
>
> Is there any reason we couldn't adopt .Trash? [I have no idea if .local has
> technical advantages over .local, I just know that kde4 will arrive before
> gnome3]
>
D'oh! Should read  "[I have no idea if .local has technical advantages 
over .Trash ..."
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]