[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Google SoC Project Idea: Kate Feature Extension
From:       "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2007-03-02 9:03:28
Message-ID: 200703020203.35579.aseigo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On March 2, 2007, Kleag wrote:
> would have been to remove kwrite instead because of the fact that the

s,remove,move,

in any case, the majority of desktop using people do not need any of the 
advantages of kate. in fact, the features of kate make it a more clumsy 
solution for most people who aren't involved in, say, writing software or 
similar tasks where kate shines.

you're trying to optimize the minimal sets for the wrong group of people: a 
power user minority.

> This would have pushed the KDE style that helps people softly progress

yes, softly progress. not rudely annoy them.

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

Full time KDE developer sponsored by Trolltech (http://www.trolltech.com)

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]