[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: Debian, KDE and the GFDL problem
From:       Brad Hards <bradh () frogmouth ! net>
Date:       2006-01-07 21:55:44
Message-ID: 200601080855.54508.bradh () frogmouth ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:43 am, Michael Pyne wrote:
> Huh?   From the section in question [1], a distribution can state in the
> Opaque copy where the Transparent copy can be obtained by a member of the
> network-using public, using public-standard network protocols.   The
> distribution also needs to make reasonably prudent steps to ensure that the
> Transparent copy is available there one year after the Opaque copy is no
> longer distributed.   But nowhere does it say the end-user must have the
> Transparent copy if they have the Opaque.
There is no point in trying to argue about this from a logical point of view. 
"Gnu FDL isn't free" is a matter of belief amongst the more fervent members 
of the Debian community. However it is their choice what they ship.

Brad

[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]