--===============0273139734==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart4268950.j2vYicmafh";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart4268950.j2vYicmafh
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sunday 08 January 2006 01:43 am, Michael Pyne wrote:
> Huh? =C2=A0From the section in question [1], a distribution can state in =
the
> Opaque copy where the Transparent copy can be obtained by a member of the
> network-using public, using public-standard network protocols. =C2=A0The
> distribution also needs to make reasonably prudent steps to ensure that t=
he
> Transparent copy is available there one year after the Opaque copy is no
> longer distributed. =C2=A0But nowhere does it say the end-user must have =
the
> Transparent copy if they have the Opaque.
There is no point in trying to argue about this from a logical point of vie=
w.=20
"Gnu FDL isn't free" is a matter of belief amongst the more fervent members=
=20
of the Debian community. However it is their choice what they ship.

Brad

--nextPart4268950.j2vYicmafh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBDwDjqGwwszQ/PZzgRAggPAJ9UPjarG+DzMARFzAjKmAE6PzQUcQCdFOLi
XUbTjv8XuePgfUkD322z3mU=
=/H06
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart4268950.j2vYicmafh--

--===============0273139734==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0273139734==--