[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Reporting bugs
From: Amilcar do Carmo Lucas <amilcar () ida ! ing ! tu-bs ! de>
Date: 2003-09-11 16:32:37
[Download RAW message or body]
kbugbuster in KDESDK
Mikolaj Machowski wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Official way of reporting bugs is: bugs.kde.org,mail-list, mail to author
>
>I understand merits of bugs.kde.org but it has also its drawbacks. Eg. for
>dial-uper going through all this pages is costly.
>
>Probably in this hot time (preparing stable 3.2 release) nobody will have
>enough time but it would be good to have mail front end to report bugs.
>Template should looks like:
>
>Summary: moving whole description to summary if summary is empty
>Product: korganizer
>Version: CVS
>Platform: Compiled Sources
>OS/Version: Linux
>Status: UNCONFIRMED
>Severity: normal
>Priority: NOR
>Component: calendar conduits
>ReportedBy: mikmach@wp.pl
>Version: CVS (using KDE Devel)
>Installed from: Compiled sources
>Compiler: gcc 3.2.2
>OS: Linux
>
>Description:
>When summary is empty whole description is moved to Summary field. This is
>disurbing. Better solution would be cut only first line and move it to S.
>
>Beside Description: field all others should be in one line. If field is
>empty, return to sender with explanation. Also send explanation of all
>fields and possible values if bugs@kde.org have in subject help or
>something.
>
>To improve chances of good forms it could have mechanism of one-way mailing
>list. When subscribing whole insctruction would be send back to subscriber.
>He/she could use it later as reference.
>
>At least current mechanism of reporting bugs in applications could use kmail
>and queuing...
>
>m.
>
>
--
Amilcar Lucas
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic