[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: [patch] request for review - apidox for kdelibs/kdeui (long)
From:       Brad Hards <bhards () bigpond ! net ! au>
Date:       2003-09-07 11:48:26
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 21:17 pm, Nicolas Goutte wrote:
> I do not think that adding #if KDE_NO_COMPACT is allowed.
>
> KDE_NO_COMPACT is only for major version KDE 2, KDE 3, future KDE 4. Inside
> a major version (KDE 3.0, 3.1, 3.2..), it should *not* be added. (Someone
> has already broken KOffice this way, so please do not start that again!)
I'm not following you.
1. Are you saying that there should not be any dependencies on KDE_NO_COMPAT 
at all? Or are you saying that could can be excluded (#ifndef KDE_NO_COMPAT), 
but not included (#ifdef KDE_NO_COMPAT)?
2. What is the purpose of KDE_NO_COMPAT? When it is used, what does that mean?

Brad
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/WxsLW6pHgIdAuOMRAthqAJ9ZB88mxmMyA0clEGdfdLIoEoW9EACgnJHF
AkuAxGQT5S5+DYx1y+AN5fE=
=yFbu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]