[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: is it time to move kpovmodeller ?
From:       Nicolas Goutte <nicolasg () snafu ! de>
Date:       2003-09-03 18:44:34
[Download RAW message or body]

Those are the previous threads on this problem:
http://lists.kde.org/?t=104133594400001&r=1&w=2
http://lists.kde.org/?t=103693947300001&r=1&w=2

Have a nice day!

On Wednesday 03 September 2003 20:20, crypt@ihug.co.nz wrote:
> On 09/03 19:51  Nicolas Goutte was heard to utter:
> > Stephan Kulow had vetoed. I doubt that his situation and therefore his
> > position has so much changed. But you might try...
> >
> > Have a nice day!
>
> I find this strange but I guess that I ahve to live with it :(
>
> Personally I think that it makes as much sense to have it in kdegraphics
> as it would to put quanta in with say kdenetwork but that is just me.
>
> Joe.
>
> > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 19:41, crypt@ihug.co.nz wrote:
> > > Back a while ago there was a call to move kpovmodeller to its own
> > > package. Is this a good time for that to be done.
> > >
> > > The aguments at the time where that it was huge compared to anything
> > > else in the module and was ratehr specialised. As it is I can't see how
> > > any of these arguments are any less relevant now.
> > >
> > > In my consideration it is past time that it was moved into its own
> > > package especially when you consider that it is over 2.5 times as big
> > > as the next biggest item in kdegraphics and is almost as big as the
> > > entire kdeutils package.
> > >
> > > Comments anyone.
> > >
> > > Joe.
> > >
> > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> > >> unsubscribe <<

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]