[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: is it time to move kpovmodeller ?
From:       crypt () ihug ! co ! nz
Date:       2003-09-03 18:20:25
[Download RAW message or body]

On 09/03 19:51  Nicolas Goutte was heard to utter:
> Stephan Kulow had vetoed. I doubt that his situation and therefore his 
> position has so much changed. But you might try...
> 
> Have a nice day!

I find this strange but I guess that I ahve to live with it :(

Personally I think that it makes as much sense to have it in kdegraphics
as it would to put quanta in with say kdenetwork but that is just me.

Joe.

> 
> On Wednesday 03 September 2003 19:41, crypt@ihug.co.nz wrote:
> > Back a while ago there was a call to move kpovmodeller to its own
> > package. Is this a good time for that to be done.
> >
> > The aguments at the time where that it was huge compared to anything
> > else in the module and was ratehr specialised. As it is I can't see how
> > any of these arguments are any less relevant now.
> >
> > In my consideration it is past time that it was moved into its own
> > package especially when you consider that it is over 2.5 times as big as
> > the next biggest item in kdegraphics and is almost as big as the entire
> > kdeutils package.
> >
> > Comments anyone.
> >
> > Joe.
> 
> 
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
> 

-- 
=======================================================================
in real life: Joseph Skinner         |There's no such thing as a wizard
email: crypt@ihug.co.nz              |who minds his own business
       Analyst/Programmer            | - Berengis the Black
                                     |   Court Mage to the Earls Caeline
========================================================================

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]