From kde-devel Wed Sep 03 18:44:34 2003 From: Nicolas Goutte Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2003 18:44:34 +0000 To: kde-devel Subject: Re: is it time to move kpovmodeller ? X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=106261485121536 Those are the previous threads on this problem: http://lists.kde.org/?t=104133594400001&r=1&w=2 http://lists.kde.org/?t=103693947300001&r=1&w=2 Have a nice day! On Wednesday 03 September 2003 20:20, crypt@ihug.co.nz wrote: > On 09/03 19:51 Nicolas Goutte was heard to utter: > > Stephan Kulow had vetoed. I doubt that his situation and therefore his > > position has so much changed. But you might try... > > > > Have a nice day! > > I find this strange but I guess that I ahve to live with it :( > > Personally I think that it makes as much sense to have it in kdegraphics > as it would to put quanta in with say kdenetwork but that is just me. > > Joe. > > > On Wednesday 03 September 2003 19:41, crypt@ihug.co.nz wrote: > > > Back a while ago there was a call to move kpovmodeller to its own > > > package. Is this a good time for that to be done. > > > > > > The aguments at the time where that it was huge compared to anything > > > else in the module and was ratehr specialised. As it is I can't see how > > > any of these arguments are any less relevant now. > > > > > > In my consideration it is past time that it was moved into its own > > > package especially when you consider that it is over 2.5 times as big > > > as the next biggest item in kdegraphics and is almost as big as the > > > entire kdeutils package. > > > > > > Comments anyone. > > > > > > Joe. > > > > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to > > >> unsubscribe << >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<