[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: RTL and KDE vs. QT
From:       David Faure <david () mandrakesoft ! com>
Date:       2002-06-29 10:26:51
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 29 June 2002 03:21, Arash Zeini wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 June 2002 11:27, David Faure wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 June 2002 17:46, Arash Zeini wrote:
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > After testing different applications with Farsi, we have found that the
> > > level of support for RTL and BiDi differs from appplication to
> > > application.
> > >
> > > KEdit, KBabel and KMail have it implemented best.
> >
> > Did you try KWord? ;-)
> 
> I will try this again. I have tried it but am not sure about the result. Your 
> smily makes me believe it is good :)

A few quirks remain, but on the whole I believe it's quite good.
(Try CVS or koffice-1.2-beta2)

> > Mostly Qt. But KDE apps which implement their own text layout stuff need
> > to reimplement/reuse Qt's mechanism.
> 
> Do KDE developers know this from a 'written' source? Is there any manual out 
> there in this regard?

I'm afraid not.
All of this comes from Lars' knowledge. Reading the sources for QRichText
are the only way I know to extract this knowledge. I think I can answer a
few questions on how it should work, now, though.

- -- 
David FAURE, david@mandrakesoft.com, faure@kde.org
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~david/
Contributing to: http://www.konqueror.org/, http://www.koffice.org/
KOffice-1.2-beta2 is coming very shortly...
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9HYtr72KcVAmwbhARAsQRAJ9gkcoXavsltvHzXMDxeeXd/eJu6QCgnSKQ
2C65acrdxJgdzYlWvOQreeA=
=7Kxs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]