[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: kde 3.0alpha1
From:       John Gluck <jgluckca () home ! com>
Date:       2001-10-22 21:20:06
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi

I just checked the kde site again. I thought I had read that alpha1 required Qt
beta6 or better. However, I can't seem to find that statement (the "or better"
part that is). I guess I'm wrong.

In that light, I am fixing things that will probably be fixed in the next release.
Still, kdelibs compiled with only 1 minor glitch, kdebase had only the QT_KDE_I18N
problem which propagated to many files, kdeutil compiles without incident. That's
as far as I've gotten for now.

There may be a couple of bugs when I actually try to run things. I'll take it as
an experiment and will send patches if I fix something.

John

Martijn Klingens wrote:

> On Monday 22 October 2001 20:56, John Gluck wrote:
> > I did originally post the errors and I also put in bug reports.
> > Unfortunately, the person who originally replied, decided this wasn't
> > important and snipped it
>
> But... From reading this thread I still get the impression that you are
> trying to build KDE 3.0 alpha1 against Qt 3.0 _final_. And as said before by
> several persons and explicitly mentioned in the documentation, KDE 3.0 alpha1
> requires Qt 3.0 beta6 and _nothing_ else.
>
> Your gripes regarding the i18n macros for example are unjustifed. As you
> discovered alpha1 breaks against Qt 3.0 final. Those same i18n macros however
> work the way they are in the code in Qt 3.0 beta6!
>
> So, either use the final Qt in combination with CVS HEAD. Or downgrade to
> beta6 with alpha1.
>
> Mixing both environments is not supported. It was never meant to be and it
> will never be.
>
> Martijn
>
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]