[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
From:       Olivier Goffart <ogoffart () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-04-28 6:44:37
Message-ID: 201104280844.37559.ogoffart () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Le Tuesday 26 April 2011, Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> A Dimarts, 26 d'abril de 2011, Olivier Goffart va escriure:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> > 
> > I have not seen the details about KUndo2 yet,  but what are the reasons
> > that keep you from improving QUndo in Qt?  Is there technical reasons? or
> > just political issues?
> 
> In http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-14442 ossi implies it's an
> API problem and thus as the API can not be changed in QUndo it implies it
> needs new classes. Of course one could introduce QUndo2 classes but you
> seldom do that

No.
Ossi suggest to add overloads.

> and of course there is the issue of the extreme overhead
> needed to get something into Qt vs getting it in kdelibs.

Yes, this is something that hopefully will get better soon.





[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]