[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
From: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart () kde ! org>
Date: 2011-04-28 6:44:37
Message-ID: 201104280844.37559.ogoffart () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Le Tuesday 26 April 2011, Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> A Dimarts, 26 d'abril de 2011, Olivier Goffart va escriure:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> >
> > I have not seen the details about KUndo2 yet, but what are the reasons
> > that keep you from improving QUndo in Qt? Is there technical reasons? or
> > just political issues?
>
> In http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-14442 ossi implies it's an
> API problem and thus as the API can not be changed in QUndo it implies it
> needs new classes. Of course one could introduce QUndo2 classes but you
> seldom do that
No.
Ossi suggest to add overloads.
> and of course there is the issue of the extreme overhead
> needed to get something into Qt vs getting it in kdelibs.
Yes, this is something that hopefully will get better soon.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic