From kde-core-devel  Thu Apr 28 06:44:37 2011
From: Olivier Goffart <ogoffart () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 06:44:37 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
Message-Id: <201104280844.37559.ogoffart () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=130397359827503

Le Tuesday 26 April 2011, Albert Astals Cid a écrit :
> A Dimarts, 26 d'abril de 2011, Olivier Goffart va escriure:
> > > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> > 
> > I have not seen the details about KUndo2 yet,  but what are the reasons
> > that keep you from improving QUndo in Qt?  Is there technical reasons? or
> > just political issues?
> 
> In http://bugreports.qt.nokia.com/browse/QTBUG-14442 ossi implies it's an
> API problem and thus as the API can not be changed in QUndo it implies it
> needs new classes. Of course one could introduce QUndo2 classes but you
> seldom do that

No.
Ossi suggest to add overloads.

> and of course there is the issue of the extreme overhead
> needed to get something into Qt vs getting it in kdelibs.

Yes, this is something that hopefully will get better soon.