[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
From:       Tom Albers <toma () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-04-26 7:12:32
Message-ID: b671614d-e1d8-4145-ae7d-1287ee7a6304 () contact ! kovoks ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

----- Original Message -----
> On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> 
> we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt
> and
> kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.

Forks? It does sound like to me as we take the base class from Qt and improve it for \
usage within KDE. We've done that for years and years. Does this now imply that \
that's bad practice and kdelibs is closed for such classes?

Best,
-- 
Tom Albers
KDE Sysadmin


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]