From kde-core-devel  Tue Apr 26 07:12:32 2011
From: Tom Albers <toma () kde ! org>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2011 07:12:32 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Replacement for Qt's Undo Framework
Message-Id: <b671614d-e1d8-4145-ae7d-1287ee7a6304 () contact ! kovoks ! nl>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=130380199425856

----- Original Message -----
> On Monday, April 25, 2011 22:12:55 Alexander Potashev wrote:
> > What do you think about inclusion of KUndo*2 into kdelibs?
> 
> we really don't want more duplication of code and effort between Qt
> and
> kdelibs, and we certainly don't want forks of Qt code in kdelibs.

Forks? It does sound like to me as we take the base class from Qt and improve it for usage within KDE. We've done that for years and years. Does this now imply that that's bad practice and kdelibs is closed for such classes?

Best,
-- 
Tom Albers
KDE Sysadmin