[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git
From:       "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date:       2011-01-20 22:17:14
Message-ID: 201101201417.15090.aseigo () kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]


On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Correct, it is Gerrit which is a more git based alternative to Reviewboard.
> http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/

does it have benefits over reviewboard? having just toyed with a bit after 
lunch today, it seems like it's useful to drive the entire integration 
workflow and not just smaller or one-off patches?

if that's true, would gerrit be a workable replacement for reviewboard once 
everything is moved over to git? would it be integratable with 
identify.kde.org?

i ask because if that was to become something that might eventually join our 
toolchain, it might alter how we decide to plan the workflow and the timeline 
for implementing it in full ...

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]