From kde-core-devel  Thu Jan 20 22:17:14 2011
From: "Aaron J. Seigo" <aseigo () kde ! org>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 22:17:14 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: KDE git docs for dummies ? WAS: Re: splitting up kdebase in git
Message-Id: <201101201417.15090.aseigo () kde ! org>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=129556189712330
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2723186.IydBrLIQsr"

--nextPart2723186.IydBrLIQsr
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thursday, January 20, 2011, Ben Cooksley wrote:
> Correct, it is Gerrit which is a more git based alternative to Reviewboar=
d.
> http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/

does it have benefits over reviewboard? having just toyed with a bit after=
=20
lunch today, it seems like it's useful to drive the entire integration=20
workflow and not just smaller or one-off patches?

if that's true, would gerrit be a workable replacement for reviewboard once=
=20
everything is moved over to git? would it be integratable with=20
identify.kde.org?

i ask because if that was to become something that might eventually join ou=
r=20
toolchain, it might alter how we decide to plan the workflow and the timeli=
ne=20
for implementing it in full ...

=2D-=20
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Development Frameworks

--nextPart2723186.IydBrLIQsr
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAk04tGsACgkQ1rcusafx20OPXwCfbP4NmcP8gv/Oh8lwDK9FwYs/
hVoAn22aXLF9qbKbHxCF4svZjYSlc235
=JFVq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2723186.IydBrLIQsr--