[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: kdewebkit moved to kdereview
From:       Marco Martin <notmart () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-10-28 14:07:55
Message-ID: 200910281507.55862.notmart () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wednesday 28 October 2009, Dawit A. wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 22:02:10 Chani wrote:
> > > > i ask because there is now a QGraphicsWebView included with QtWebkit
> > > > which Plasma eventually will be using instead of our own
> > > > QWebPage-behind-a- QGraphicsWidget implementation that we currently
> > > > use; being able to set the KWebPage on a QGraphicsWebView and get
> > > > everything, including KWallet integration, would be optimal.
> > >
> > > That is exactly the kind of thing KWebPage is actually designed to
> > > solve. You use it in place of its Qt counter part to get all of the KDE
> > > integration for free...
> >
> > yes but in plasma we need a *graphics*widget, not a widget. are you going
> >  to provide that?
> 
> Well if you mean are we going to provide a KDE re-implementaion of
> QGraphicsWebView, then there is no plan to do that at this point.

nope, because we can't use a QWidget at all, too overhead for a thing like 
that

> Having said that simply doing what Aaron suggested above, setting KWebPage
>  on the QGraphicsWebView, you get 99.9% of the KDE integration. Besides

that would be rocking! what we need is in fact a subclass of a QWebPage, at 
the moment we purely use a qwebpage to paint, we will probably switch to 
qgraphicswebview, but i suppose one can just feed a KWebPage to it.

>  convenience, there are only a couple of additional features in KWebView
>  and I am sure someone can easily add a QGraphicsWebView re-implementation
>  that mimics KWebView's functionality to kdewebkit if needed...
> 


-- 
Marco Martin
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]