[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Documentation Disasters
From:       Thomas Zander <zander () planescape ! com>
Date:       2002-03-04 18:48:44
[Download RAW message or body]


On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Martin Konold wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sunday 03 March 2002 02:02, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 March 2002 01:21 pm, Lauri Watts wrote:
> > > I think putting ACL's in place now would be more administrative work and
> > > might alienate people.  Admittedly I don't know how much administrative
> > > work it actually is, and if it can be handed off to us to manage, or if
> > > it's something we'll be annoying the CVS admins with every five
> > > minutes.
> >
> > It shouldn't be too difficult. Whenever someone wants to commit docs who
> 
> Please explain to me way the simple roll-back features of CVS are not 
> sufficient for Lauri?

I remember something like a commit being processed by automatically run scripts
which commit in lots of other places.
I.e. the rollback is too basic; all the other files have to be found manually
and rollback-ed as well. Also taking into account that work might have been 
commited as well...
 
> I do think that ACL's are overkill and impose inefficient overhead for KDE.

I agree with Lauri here that education works best.

-- 
Thomas Zander                                            zander@earthling.net
The only thing worse than failure is the fear of trying something new

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]