--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 04, 2002 at 09:13:53AM +0100, Martin Konold wrote:
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> On Sunday 03 March 2002 02:02, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 March 2002 01:21 pm, Lauri Watts wrote:
> > > I think putting ACL's in place now would be more administrative work =
and
> > > might alienate people.  Admittedly I don't know how much administrati=
ve
> > > work it actually is, and if it can be handed off to us to manage, or =
if
> > > it's something we'll be annoying the CVS admins with every five
> > > minutes.
> >
> > It shouldn't be too difficult. Whenever someone wants to commit docs who
>=20
> Please explain to me way the simple roll-back features of CVS are not=20
> sufficient for Lauri?

I remember something like a commit being processed by automatically run scr=
ipts
which commit in lots of other places.
I.e. the rollback is too basic; all the other files have to be found manual=
ly
and rollback-ed as well. Also taking into account that work might have been=
=20
commited as well...
=20
> I do think that ACL's are overkill and impose inefficient overhead for KD=
E.

I agree with Lauri here that education works best.

--=20
Thomas Zander                                            zander@earthling.n=
et
The only thing worse than failure is the fear of trying something new

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8g8GMCojCW6H2z/QRAocnAJoCwLx7GvTHp1vv9yMFQwwC8MqjLQCff+KT
Q5sNufq6JaHUk7pQ1gVSbls=
=7d6Q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND--