[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bindings
Subject:    Re: PyKF5 use of the SIP second declaration
From:       Shaheed Haque <srhaque () theiet ! org>
Date:       2017-01-21 12:34:59
Message-ID: CAHAc2jeeYYYuuveKiMzYW2pY12D=MOWo6N16izntKh7rgYy+0Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks for confirming.

As for the second declaration etc, the SIP specification at
http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html refers to it
as the "*c++-signature*", so I'll look into replacing the number with a
suffix like "_cpp".

Thanks, Shaheed

On 21 January 2017 at 10:58, Stephen Kelly <steveire@gmail.com> wrote:

> Shaheed Haque wrote:
>
> > Hi Steve,
> >
> > Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the
> > second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here:
>
> > I suggest that for consistency the second set of parameters should also
> be
> > an array:
>
> That makes sense to me.
>
> I'm not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate
> names which convey what the second set of values are for?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve.
>
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div><div>Thanks for confirming.<br><br></div>As for the second \
declaration etc, the SIP specification at <a \
href="http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html">http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/specification_files.html</a> \
refers to it as the &quot;<em>c++-signature</em>&quot;, so I&#39;ll look into \
replacing the number with a suffix like &quot;_cpp&quot;.<br><br></div>Thanks, \
Shaheed<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 21 January \
2017 at 10:58, Stephen Kelly <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:steveire@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">steveire@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">Shaheed Haque wrote:<br> <br>
&gt; Hi Steve,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Another smallpoint to resolve is around the logic for the support of the<br>
&gt; second declaration in SIP files, e.g. the bit in [] brackets here:<br>
<br>
</span><span class="">&gt; I suggest that for consistency the second set of \
parameters should also be<br> &gt; an array:<br>
<br>
</span>That makes sense to me.<br>
<br>
I&#39;m not a fan of numbers in interfaces though. Can you choose alternate<br>
names which convey what the second set of values are for?<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Steve.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]