[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde
Subject:    Re: QT?
From:       dep <dep () westnet ! com>
Date:       1999-08-26 14:41:20
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 26 Aug 1999, Kaplan, Paul wrote:

|1.	Is 1.1.2 compiled against QT 1.4 or 2.0?

1.4

|2.	Can it be compiled against 2.0?

not successfully.

|3.	Is there any compelling reason for or against doing this?  (One
|obvious advantage would be to have only one set of QT files on the system
|and then use them for koffice as well.  I am somewhat disk limited and would
|like not to have unnecessary files around.)

the compelling reason is determined by whether or not you want the
results to work. <g>

|4.	If it makes sense to compile against 2.0, what do I need to do?  Can
|I just remove the 1.4 files, install the 2.0 files and the 1.1.2 (and
|koffice) source, and ./configure, make, make install?

n/a

-- 
dep__________________________________________________________________
                2000 is a number that breaks computers.
                01-01-01 is when the millennium begins.
-- 
Send posts to:  kde@lists.netcentral.net
 Send all commands to:  kde-request@lists.netcentral.net
  Put your command in the SUBJECT of the message:
   "subscribe", "unsubscribe", "set digest on", or "set digest off"
PLEASE READ THE ARCHIVED MESSAGES AT http://lists.kde.org/ BEFORE POSTING
**********************************************************************
This list is from your pals at NetCentral <http://www.netcentral.net/>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]