[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] Very bad ebuild-writing practice.
From:       Dan Naumov <jago () telefragged ! com>
Date:       2002-08-17 18:32:36
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, 17 Aug 2002 14:12:54 -0400
"mike" <vapier@netzero.com> wrote:

> this was a known issue when the ebuild made (i made it ;])
> but the solution was to grab a stable-ish build, make the digest
> off of it, and post it to ibiblio.  then, when the next stable-ish
> version came along, a new digest would be put out and the
> version be bumped up to -r1 and so on and so forth.  the
> problem lays with the fact that the last release of quakeforge
> is like 0.3.0.  this version is dead and majorly obsolete.
> the 'newer' versions get put out when someone famil with
> the project feels it is needed.  also, that tar ball isnt auto-generated
> every single hour ... not sure if it is even autogenerated ...
> but yeah, i think the version should have had at least a
> date tag on it now that you mention it.  once i fix the
> ebuild for gcc3.x ill post the new one with a date tag
> -mike

The 0.5.x CVS snapshots to which the ebuild links ARE automatically generated every \
hour. Ask on OPN #QuakeForge if you don't trust me.

Dan Naumov aka Jago
_______________________________________________
gentoo-dev mailing list
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]