[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gentoo-dev
Subject:    Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 3.1/3.2
From:       "Matthew J. Turk" <m-turk () nwu ! edu>
Date:       2002-07-28 17:44:20
[Download RAW message or body]

> 3.2 is labeled by GNU to be 100% multi-vender compliant with the C++ ABI 
> now. Which is the core prob with the new gcc releases. By skipping 
> straight to 3.2 we'll avoid 2 problem transitions.. 1 from 2.95 to 3.1 
> and then from 3.1/3.1.1 to 3.2 instead we'll have 2.95 to 3.2. 

The GCC Page (http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/changes.html) says it is MultiVendor V3
compatible - does that mean that it's compatible (again) with 2.95?  There
aren't any other changes listed on the page, so does that also mean that no
changes in code are required from 3.1 to 3.2 to compile?  Will this just mean
going from 2.95 to 3.2 will be a matter of fixing the ISO C/C++ standards, just
as for going from 2.95 to 3.0?



mjt
---------------------------------------------------
Matthew J. Turk <m-turk@nwu.edu>       ICQ: 3856787
"Music is the Best." - FZ         thecatfishman.org
     http://pubweb.nwu.edu/~mjt631/spamoff.htm
_______________________________________________
gentoo-dev mailing list
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org
http://lists.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]