'Re: [cisco-voip] rings to answer'

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List: cisco-voip
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] rings to answer
From: "Rossella Mariotti-Jones" <rossella () chemeketa ! edu>
Date: 2009-03-30 21:12:02
Message-ID: D63A25821E9AE349ADBAB6BB1F0A766C0C94AECF () cccmail2 ! chemeketa ! network
[Download RAW message or body]

--===============0462804023==
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C9B17C.2BF2F184"

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

[Attachment #2 (text/plain)]

Yes, we're comparing the same ring.

So, we changed the device pool on the ATA, saved it, changed it back to the previous \
one, save it, and now the external call also gets an answer on the second ring…. \
Magic?

rossella mariotti-jones | network analyst | chemeketa community college | \
rossella@chemeketa.edu | 503-589-7775

P To reduce waste, please consider not printing this email unless necessary

From: Lelio Fulgenzi [mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca] 
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 12:46 PM
To: Rossella Mariotti-Jones
Cc: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] rings to answer

This may sound silly, but make sure to compare the same "ring", i.e. the ring you \
hear as the caller is different then the ring you hear as the called party. For \
example, if I pick up my IP phone and call another IP phone, the number of rings I \
hear in my headset before the call goes to voicemail is different than the number of \
rings the called party hears. The ratio is 3:4 calling:called party typically.

I would expect a delay with FXO ports, but not PRIs.

---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt

----- Original Message -----
From: "Rossella Mariotti-Jones" <rossella@chemeketa.edu>
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:33:25 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] rings to answer

We have a fax machine hooked up to an ATA186 at a remote site which has a local PRI \
to the CO. If we call the internal 4 digit extension the fax answers in 2 rings, if \
we call the 10 digit number the fax answers in 6 rings. Why is the response time so \
much longer in the second scenario? TIA.

rossella mariotti-jones | network analyst | chemeketa community college | \
rossella@chemeketa.edu | 503-589-7775

P To reduce waste, please consider not printing this email unless necessary

_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list \
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" \
xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" \
xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" \
xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" \
xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" \
xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" \
xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" \
xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" \
xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" \
xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" \
xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" \
xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" \
xmlns:odc="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" \
xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" \
xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" \
xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:D="DAV:" \
xmlns:mt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/meetings/" \
xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" \
xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" \
xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" \
xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" \
xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" \
xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" \
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" \
xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" \
xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" \
xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" \
xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" \
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" \
xmlns:udcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/soap" \
xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" \
xmlns:udcp2p="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" \
xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" \
xmlns:dsss="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" \
xmlns:dssi="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig" \
xmlns:mdssi="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/digital-signature" \
xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" \
xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" \
xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" \
xmlns:spwp="http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/webpartpages" \
xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" \
xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" \
xmlns:pptsl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/SlideLibrary/" \
xmlns:spsl="http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortalServer/PublishedLinksService" \
xmlns:Z="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:st="&#1;" \
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
	{font-family:Calibri;
	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Tahoma;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Verdana;
	panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:"Lucida Console";
	panose-1:2 11 6 9 4 5 4 2 2 4;}
@font-face
	{font-family:Webdings;
	panose-1:5 3 1 2 1 5 9 6 7 3;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
	{margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:11.0pt;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:blue;
	text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	color:purple;
	text-decoration:underline;}
p
	{mso-style-priority:99;
	margin:0in;
	margin-bottom:.0001pt;
	font-size:12.0pt;
	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
	{mso-style-type:personal;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle19
	{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
	font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
	color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
	{mso-style-type:export-only;
	font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
	{size:8.5in 11.0in;
	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
	{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>

<div class=Section1>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Yes, we're comparing the same
ring.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

So, we changed the device pool
on the ATA, saved it, changed it back to the previous one, save it, and now the
external call also gets an answer on the second ring…. Magic?<o:p></o:p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:#1F497D'>rossella
mariotti-jones | network analyst | chemeketa community college |
rossella@chemeketa.edu | 503-589-7775<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:20.0pt;font-family:Webdings;
color:green'>P</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:green'> </span><b><i><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Lucida Console";
color:green'>To reduce waste, please consider not printing this email unless
necessary</span></i></b><span \
style='font-size:9.0pt;color:navy'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=MsoNormal><b><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span \
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Lelio Fulgenzi \
[mailto:lelio@uoguelph.ca] <br> <b>Sent:</b> Monday, March 30, 2009 12:46 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Rossella Mariotti-Jones<br>
<b>Cc:</b> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [cisco-voip] rings to answer<o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'>This may sound silly, but make sure to compare the same
&quot;ring&quot;, i.e. the ring you hear as the caller is different then the
ring you hear as the called party. For example, if I pick up my IP phone and
call another IP phone, the number of rings I hear in my headset before the call
goes to voicemail is different than the number of rings the called party hears.
The ratio is 3:4 calling:called party typically.<br>
<br>
I would expect a delay with FXO ports, but not PRIs.<br>
<br>
---<br>
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.<br>
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1<br>
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)<br>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^<br>
&quot;Bad grammar makes me [sic]&quot; - Tshirt<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: &quot;Rossella Mariotti-Jones&quot; &lt;rossella@chemeketa.edu&gt;<br>
To: cisco-voip@puck.nether.net<br>
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 2:33:25 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern<br>
Subject: [cisco-voip] rings to answer<br>
<br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></span></p>

We have a fax machine hooked up to
an ATA186 at a remote site which has a local PRI to the CO. If we call the
internal 4 digit extension the fax answers in 2 rings, if we call the 10 digit
number the fax answers in 6 rings. Why is the response time so much longer in
the second scenario? TIA.<o:p></o:p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.5pt;color:black'>rossella
mariotti-jones | network analyst | chemeketa community college |
rossella@chemeketa.edu | 503-589-7775</span><span \
style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:20.0pt;font-family:Webdings;
color:green'>P</span><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:green'> </span><b><i><span style='font-size:9.0pt;font-family:"Lucida Console";
color:green'>To reduce waste, please consider not printing this email unless
necessary</span></i></b><span style='color:black'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:black'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
color:black'><br>
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip \
<o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

</body>

</html>

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

--===============0462804023==--

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 