[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       cisco-voip
Subject:    Re: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address for
From:       Ryan Ratliff <rratliff () cisco ! com>
Date:       2009-03-30 20:31:38
Message-ID: DD40BA48-3118-4B3A-B874-7F1A5642D696 () cisco ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

If you are looking to configure your dial-plan using RouteLists ahead  
of time then using dummy addresses for the H.323 gateways is not a  
problem at all.

-Ryan

On Mar 30, 2009, at 4:11 PM, Steven Sarte wrote:

I would love to use Loopbacks, but that would require a significant
change in routing.  Inherited all sites using static routes.

On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio@uoguelph.ca>  
wrote:
> I use loopback addresses even for MGCP.
>
> It's great, because if we ever make network changes, I don't care.  
> Plus,
> with redundant links, you pretty much need them. Loopbacks that is.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^I  
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul" <asobihoudai@yahoo.com>
> To: "Steven Sarte" <steven.sarte@gmail.com>, cisco- 
> voip@puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:43:44 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP  
> Address for
> H.323 addresses.
>
>
> I think it'd be best practice for you to configure a loopback  
> interface as
> the H.323 interface for the gateways.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Steven Sarte <steven.sarte@gmail.com>
> To: "cisco-voip@puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Monday, March 30, 2009 3:28:50 PM
> Subject: [cisco-voip] Building new CallManager with fake IP Address  
> for
> H.323 addresses.
>
> Do you think it might be an issue if I use dummy IP Addresses for
> Voice Gateways with the protocol H.323.  The reason is I have over 25
> sites to configure and thought it would be easier to configure all
> sites day one.
>
> Thanks,
> Steven Sarte
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]