[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-usability
Subject: Re: simpler UI for konqy
From: Luke Sandell <sandell () freeshell ! org>
Date: 2004-01-16 18:23:33
Message-ID: 200401161323.34131.sandell () freeshell ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Friday 16 January 2004 08:54 am, Leo Savernik wrote:
> Is there really? How many users would refuse to use a browser that has an
> up button?
>
I think there is a misunderstanding here. What I thought he meant by
"distinct webbrowser" is something homegrown as opposed to Mozilla or Opera.
That's why I said there was a need for one. But no, I do not advocate
producing another browser separate from Konqueror.
The original quote was:
> As I already mentionened elsewhere,
> if there is the need for a distinct web browser in KDE,
> it must be an application of its own. Everything else leads to an incoherent
> patchwork that will make neither side happy.
Regards,
Luke Sandell
_______________________________________________
kde-usability mailing list
kde-usability@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-usability
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic