[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       quanta
Subject:    Re: [Quanta] quanta
From:       Børge_Holen <borge () arivene ! net>
Date:       2006-09-17 20:03:02
Message-ID: 200609172203.03474.borge () arivene ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 17 September 2006 10:41, Onno Timmerman wrote:
> I was wondering:
>
> How many developers are working on quanta. How fast is quanta making
> progress? What will be new in Quanta 4 ?
>
> How many proffesional users does quanta have.

Whats professional in yer opinion? And as I'm writing this, I can see that 
Eric has made a reply to this, that I'll be reading pretty soon.

> Could there be a comparing chart between
> Quanta, Eclipse, Textmate, phpEdit etc...

I've tried to use Eclipse witch falls very short on how to deal with "project 
type of work" as I remember. Then again, I got buddies swearing for this one.

phpEdit as I remember looks unfinished ( I think it was this one)... in every 
aspect.

I also know of a couple that uses DW, witch seems to work for them. nice 
project interface, and with v8 it suddenly learned to use CSS for real.
But then again, made for spear time excersises and not for working.

On the bright side... All of them looks like an editor ;)

Perhaps its just me, but I'm used to the best of the best, and making projects 
of a usable size does tend to separate whats hot/not.

>
> Onno
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Quanta mailing list
> Quanta@mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta

-- 
---
Børge
Kennel Arivene 
http://www.arivene.net
---
_______________________________________________
Quanta mailing list
Quanta@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/quanta

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]