[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       koffice-devel
Subject:    Re: Applications categories
From:       Andrew Dorrell <andrew.dorrell () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-02-26 23:15:24
Message-ID: 49A7228C.3060004 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Cyrille Berger wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As you know the oxygen team is currently working on the icons for 
> KOffice 2.0 applications, our logos are descritely used in those 
> icons, since we used four colors for each of the category, this 
> raised, on IRC, the question on the categories, and which apps belongs 
> to which category.
>
>
> Currently, we have:
> Productivity Applications: kword, kspread, kpresenter, kexi
> Creativity Applications: kivio, karbon14, krita
> Management Application: kplato
> Supporting Applications: kchart, kformula
>
>
> The two main criticism against this scheme were that kivio doesn't 
> really belong to the same category as karbon and krita, and kivio 
> looks a little bit lonely in its own category.

IMHO kivio -> productivity applications

 From an anglo-english POV "management" for kplato seems ok to me.  
Perhaps it is confused with system management?  Personally though I'm 
not sure the distinction is required - for one application, that has 
just lost its maintainer.  Which leads me to ask are you really trying 
to make 4 categories just to match the 4 colours?

perhaps, just to "spice" it you might consider

Publishing applications: kword, kpresenter
Graphics/Design applications: karbon14, krita
Business applications: kspread, kexi, kplato
Tools: kchart, kformula


But this is not a biggie :-)


Regards,
_______________________________________________
koffice-devel mailing list
koffice-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/koffice-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]