[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-redhat-users
Subject: kde-redhat-users digest, Vol 1 #988 - 13 msgs
From: kde-redhat-users-request () lists ! sourceforge ! net
Date: 2005-10-14 17:50:28
Message-ID: 20051014175200.563D789745 () sc8-sf-spam1 ! sourceforge ! net
[Download RAW message or body]
Send kde-redhat-users mailing list submissions to
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of kde-redhat-users digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: GLib-GObject (Eli Wapniarski)
2. Kmix still a problem on FC4 and with KDE 3.4.3 (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Fettouhi?=)
3. Re: Re: FC3 kde 3.4.3 GL xscreensaver issue (Clive Messer)
4. Re: FC4 Kdeaddons kdeaccessibility (Rex Dieter)
5. Re: GLib-GObject (Claude Jones)
6. Re: GLib-GObject (Claude Jones)
7. Re: Kmix still a problem on FC4 and with KDE
3.4.3 (Rex Dieter)
8. Re: Kmix still a problem on FC4 and with KDE 3.4.3 (Rex Dieter)
9. release checksum problem and apt-get (Eli Wapniarski)
10. dependency issue on upgrade to 3.4.3 (Claude Jones)
11. Re: dependency issue on upgrade to 3.4.3 (Rex Dieter)
12. Re: dependency issue on upgrade to 3.4.3 (Eli Wapniarski)
[Attachment #4 (multipart/digest)]
--__--__--
Message: 1
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] GLib-GObject
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 09:46:29 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <200510091516.30058.claude_jones@levitjames.com> \
<200510132337.21783.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org> \
<200510131813.08325.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510131813.08325.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510140946.29489.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Friday, 14 בOctober 2005 00:13, Claude Jones wrote:
> On Thursday 13 October 2005 5:37 pm, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > On Thursday, 13 בOctober 2005 22:12, Claude Jones wrote:
> > > That plethora of repos is puzzling...I'm looking into this at the
> > > moment
> >
> > They came from the rpmforge-release rpm which installs repos / channels
> > confiugrations for apt-get, yum and smart
>
> OK - let me make sure I understand. You're saying that the smart rpm from
> rpmforge-release is what installed those repos? Do I have that right? Also,
> has it appeared to you as if smart was checking channels even when they are
> not checked in the selection boxes?
>
If you recall, when this first began Colin suggeted that rpmforge-release gets
installed so that the dries channel gets automagically placed in smarts
channel repo and that in turn would make things easy to get. If you didn't do
this manually, then yes, it more than likely came with smart as well.
> > > I got my investigative juices flowing. Let me hold off on your offer
> > > for awhile. I'd like to figure this out, including why the repos got
> > > added, and also other things... It will be a useful exercise for me.
> >
> > Let me know.
>
> Thanks again - if you get some insight into how the prioritizing is
> supposed to work, and you're so inclined, let me know - you can do so off
> list if you think the other members will think it too OT...
Gentle readers... please bear with me... this really isn't off topic but, bang
on topic. We use kde-redhat and expect that kde-redhat's rpms are installed
on the system and functioning. This will demonstrate, without prejudice, if
Claude will accept my help, that we as kde-redhat users have a problem. And,
its serious, because as apt-get gets phased out there will be no way at
present to ensure that we are getting kde-redhat RPMs. I promise, I will try
to make this as short as possible.
Unfortuneately, smart has no documentation, as yet, for anything. And that
includes prioritization. Almost all the responses to comments made in the
mailing lists that have received, in short, "that's interesting" and "good
idea".
In yum priorities work, by placing which repository you want to get packages
from "first" to be placed in yum.conf in the order that you want them
searched. Unfortuneatley, there is no way to tell yum that if a package
exists in the kde-redhat repository to get the packages exclusively from that
repository and ignore all others. Which means that higher versions existing
in other repos will get installed. Because kde-redhat for fc4 relies on repos
from fc4 extras conflicts arise where packages such kde-artwork, or
kde-network, or digikam, etc from kde-extras if yum determines that the
version of package is a more recent version. As such, and at best, features
that you expect to work might not work without understanding why. At worst,
things might not work at all.
Smart is a little different but, essentially the problem persists there as
well. Priorities work by setting priority values inside individual channel
files. This setting seems to be logical in that whats supposed to happen, as
best as I can determine from the FAQ at smartpm, setting a higher number for
the priority should raise the priority level of the channel. 0 being default
priority and a negative number -1 being ignore the channel all together. In
part this works.
Setting the kde-redhat channels to a priority of 10 will in fact trigger
exclusivity. However, once I set, priority on any other channel, (ie 9 for
freshrpms) then things seem to be broken. And suddenly the superseeding
versions from fc4 extras reappear.
apt-get prioritization seems to work as long as the files in the base
directory are in order (Rex????). The documentation is better than most and
can be found on the man pages if apt is installed on your computer.
Essentially prioritization works via catagorization. In short, setting the
priority of a repo to 1001 will make that repo top priority to the exclusion
of all others. There should only be one of those (We're getting there Claude
we have one more step before I will ask you to download and install the
updates to harmonize your system). Essentially, lowering the priority numbers
for the other repositories used will lower the level of exclusivity. However,
this is not the end of the story, because as mentioned, apt-get
prioritization also categorizes its priorities (read the man pages).
Trying to make this as short as possible. If a package comes exclusively from
a repository that has a lower priority it will get installed. If that same
repository has a supersceeding version it will be ignored in favor of the
package that comes from the higher prioritized repository. Once the general
priorities are set, then, if required individual packages can also be
prioritzed. And in apt-get this works.
I hope this explanation is clear
Eli
--__--__--
Message: 2
Message-Id: <434F7DDF.6000905@exp2.physik.uni-giessen.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:43:59 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?André_Fettouhi?= <Andre.Fettouhi@exp2.physik.uni-giessen.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923)
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: Quoted-Printable
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] Kmix still a problem on FC4 and with KDE 3.4.3
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
I reinstalled FC4 on my machine (DELL Inspiron 8200) 3 days ago and I
did a straight update of KDE to 3.4.3 from kde-redhat. I haven't done
any configurations of my desktop at all, everything was stock but after
the KDE upgrade the kmix window pops up again at every login either root
or user? It's rather irritating and I don't know how to fix it because
kmix should only be running in tray (has been set to that). Any ideas?
Kind Regards
André Fettouhi
--
-------------------------------------------------------
Cand.Scient. André Fettouhi
Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen
II. Physikalisches Institut
Arbeitsgruppe Prof. Geissel
Heinrich-Buff-Ring 14
Office: Raum 25
D-35392 Giessen
Germany
Telephone: +49-641-99-33253
Fax: +49-641-99-33239
-------------------------------------------------------
--__--__--
Message: 3
From: Clive Messer <clive@vacuumtube.org.uk>
Organization: Vacuumtube Org
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Re: FC3 kde 3.4.3 GL xscreensaver issue
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 11:07:26 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <200510122355.25872.clive@vacuumtube.org.uk> \
<434E4D25.6000603@math.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <434E4D25.6000603@math.unl.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510141107.27122.clive@vacuumtube.org.uk>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thursday 13 Oct 2005 13:03, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Clive Messer wrote:
> > Just noticed that GL screensavers no longer work since upgrading to kde
> > 3.4.3 today.
> >
> > kdeartwork-3.4.3-1.0.fc3.kde
> > xscreensaver-gl-extras-4.21-1.0.3.kde
>
> Can anyone confirm this?
>
> Clive, what videocard/X-driver are you using?
Hi Rex,
I'm using the closed source nvidia driver, nvidia-glx-1.0.7676-0.lvn.2.3 with
a 6800GT, two flat panel, twin-view.
Can run any of the *.kss GL screensavers, but none of the GL ones from
xscreensaver.
Errors on the VT when trying to launch GL screensavers with
kdeartwork-3.4.3-1.0.fc3.kde ......
X error in rubik:
X Error of failed request: BadColor (invalid Colormap parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 92 (X_LookupColor)
Resource id in failed request: 0x0
Serial number of failed request: 424
Current serial number in output stream: 424
X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3
Major opcode: 8
Minor opcode: 0
Resource id: 0x280056c
X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3
Major opcode: 8
Minor opcode: 0
Resource id: 0x280056c
X error in sproingies:
X Error of failed request: BadColor (invalid Colormap parameter)
Major opcode of failed request: 92 (X_LookupColor)
Resource id in failed request: 0x0
Serial number of failed request: 424
Current serial number in output stream: 424
I will try using the 'nv' driver later today.
Regards
Clive
--
Clive Messer <clive@vacuumtube.org.uk>
--__--__--
Message: 4
Message-ID: <434F9E7E.3010302@math.unl.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 07:03:10 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <200510131926.44840.pelle.ekh@koping.net>
In-Reply-To: <200510131926.44840.pelle.ekh@koping.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] Re: FC4 Kdeaddons kdeaccessibility
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
P. Ekholm wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Thank you for the new kde-3.4.3 packages, they work very well. Packages of
> kdeaccessibility and kdeaddons are missing though for FC4. Maybe you have
> forgotten them. :) It's no hurry though with them, just wanted to make you
> aware of this.
Oops, fixed.
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 5
From: Claude Jones <claude_jones@levitjames.com>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] GLib-GObject
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:16:54 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <200510091516.30058.claude_jones@levitjames.com> \
<200510131813.08325.claude_jones@levitjames.com> \
<200510131840.25127.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510131840.25127.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510140816.55035.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Thu October 13 2005 6:40 pm, Claude Jones wrote:
>
> By the way, just to let Colin know, and others, regarding the subject of
> this long thread, the update to smart .40 has fixed the issue of warnings
> regarding GLib-GObject...
Well, I spoke to soon - the GLib warnings have returned...
--
Claude Jones
Bluemont, VA, USA
--__--__--
Message: 6
From: Claude Jones <claude_jones@levitjames.com>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] GLib-GObject
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:19:58 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
References: <200510091516.30058.claude_jones@levitjames.com> \
<200510131813.08325.claude_jones@levitjames.com> \
<200510140946.29489.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
In-Reply-To: <200510140946.29489.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510140819.58608.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Fri October 14 2005 3:46 am, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> On Friday, 14 בOctober 2005 00:13, Claude Jones wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 October 2005 5:37 pm, Eli Wapniarski wrote:
> > > On Thursday, 13 בOctober 2005 22:12, Claude Jones wrote:
> > > > That plethora of repos is puzzling...I'm looking into this at the
> > > > moment
> > >
> > > They came from the rpmforge-release rpm which installs repos / channels
> > > confiugrations for apt-get, yum and smart
> >
> > OK - let me make sure I understand. You're saying that the smart rpm from
> > rpmforge-release is what installed those repos? Do I have that right?
> > Also, has it appeared to you as if smart was checking channels even when
> > they are not checked in the selection boxes?
>
> If you recall, when this first began Colin suggeted that rpmforge-release
> gets installed so that the dries channel gets automagically placed in
> smarts channel repo and that in turn would make things easy to get. If you
> didn't do this manually, then yes, it more than likely came with smart as
> well.
>
> > > > I got my investigative juices flowing. Let me hold off on your offer
> > > > for awhile. I'd like to figure this out, including why the repos got
> > > > added, and also other things... It will be a useful exercise for me.
> > >
> > > Let me know.
> >
> > Thanks again - if you get some insight into how the prioritizing is
> > supposed to work, and you're so inclined, let me know - you can do so off
> > list if you think the other members will think it too OT...
>
> Gentle readers... please bear with me... this really isn't off topic but,
> bang on topic. We use kde-redhat and expect that kde-redhat's rpms are
> installed on the system and functioning. This will demonstrate, without
> prejudice, if Claude will accept my help, that we as kde-redhat users have
> a problem. And, its serious, because as apt-get gets phased out there will
> be no way at present to ensure that we are getting kde-redhat RPMs. I
> promise, I will try to make this as short as possible.
>
> Unfortuneately, smart has no documentation, as yet, for anything. And that
> includes prioritization. Almost all the responses to comments made in the
> mailing lists that have received, in short, "that's interesting" and "good
> idea".
>
> In yum priorities work, by placing which repository you want to get
> packages from "first" to be placed in yum.conf in the order that you want
> them searched. Unfortuneatley, there is no way to tell yum that if a
> package exists in the kde-redhat repository to get the packages exclusively
> from that repository and ignore all others. Which means that higher
> versions existing in other repos will get installed. Because kde-redhat for
> fc4 relies on repos from fc4 extras conflicts arise where packages such
> kde-artwork, or kde-network, or digikam, etc from kde-extras if yum
> determines that the version of package is a more recent version. As such,
> and at best, features that you expect to work might not work without
> understanding why. At worst, things might not work at all.
>
> Smart is a little different but, essentially the problem persists there as
> well. Priorities work by setting priority values inside individual channel
> files. This setting seems to be logical in that whats supposed to happen,
> as best as I can determine from the FAQ at smartpm, setting a higher number
> for the priority should raise the priority level of the channel. 0 being
> default priority and a negative number -1 being ignore the channel all
> together. In part this works.
>
> Setting the kde-redhat channels to a priority of 10 will in fact trigger
> exclusivity. However, once I set, priority on any other channel, (ie 9 for
> freshrpms) then things seem to be broken. And suddenly the superseeding
> versions from fc4 extras reappear.
>
> apt-get prioritization seems to work as long as the files in the base
> directory are in order (Rex????). The documentation is better than most and
> can be found on the man pages if apt is installed on your computer.
>
> Essentially prioritization works via catagorization. In short, setting the
> priority of a repo to 1001 will make that repo top priority to the
> exclusion of all others. There should only be one of those (We're getting
> there Claude we have one more step before I will ask you to download and
> install the updates to harmonize your system). Essentially, lowering the
> priority numbers for the other repositories used will lower the level of
> exclusivity. However, this is not the end of the story, because as
> mentioned, apt-get
> prioritization also categorizes its priorities (read the man pages).
>
> Trying to make this as short as possible. If a package comes exclusively
> from a repository that has a lower priority it will get installed. If that
> same repository has a supersceeding version it will be ignored in favor of
> the package that comes from the higher prioritized repository. Once the
> general priorities are set, then, if required individual packages can also
> be prioritzed. And in apt-get this works.
>
> I hope this explanation is clear
>
> Eli
Took a couple of reads due to the lack of a couple of commas - but, I think
I've got it... ;-)
--
Claude Jones
Bluemont, VA, USA
--__--__--
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:11:06 -0500 (CDT)
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter1@math.unl.edu>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Kmix still a problem on FC4 and with KDE
3.4.3
In-Reply-To: <434F7DDF.6000905@exp2.physik.uni-giessen.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510140808550.8396@sting-fc4.unl.edu>
References: <434F7DDF.6000905@exp2.physik.uni-giessen.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="1568744884-1179577779-1129295466=:8396"
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, André Fettouhi wrote:
> I reinstalled FC4 on my machine (DELL Inspiron 8200) 3 days ago and I did a
> straight update of KDE to 3.4.3 from kde-redhat. I haven't done any
> configurations of my desktop at all, everything was stock but after the KDE
> upgrade the kmix window pops up again at every login either root or user?
KMix->Settings->Configure KMix
*check* Dock into Panel
*check* Enable system tray volume control
OK
Close Kmix mixer window.
You should now have kmix only in your system tray.
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 8
Message-ID: <434FB01E.7080607@math.unl.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:18:22 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] Kmix still a problem on FC4 and with KDE 3.4.3
References: <434F7DDF.6000905@exp2.physik.uni-giessen.de> \
<Pine.LNX.4.64.0510140808550.8396@sting-fc4.unl.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0510140808550.8396@sting-fc4.unl.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Rex Dieter wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2005, André Fettouhi wrote:
>
> > I reinstalled FC4 on my machine (DELL Inspiron 8200) 3 days ago and I
> > did a straight update of KDE to 3.4.3 from kde-redhat. I haven't done
> > any configurations of my desktop at all, everything was stock but
> > after the KDE upgrade the kmix window pops up again at every login
> > either root or user?
>
>
> KMix->Settings->Configure KMix
> *check* Dock into Panel
> *check* Enable system tray volume control
> OK
>
> Close Kmix mixer window.
>
> You should now have kmix only in your system tray.
OR, if you don't want kmix *at all*, close kmix window, exit kmix system
tray icon, save your KDE session (see KControl->KDE
Components->Session Manager for details on session management).
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 9
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 17:07:47 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510141707.48370.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] release checksum problem and apt-get
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Thanks Rex
Works like a charm now.
Eli
--__--__--
Message: 10
From: Claude Jones <claude_jones@levitjames.com>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 13:30:25 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510141330.25294.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
Subject: [kde-redhat-users] dependency issue on upgrade to 3.4.3
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
*** Error: Missing Dependency: kdelibs = 6:3.4.2 is needed by package
kdeartwork-icons
Is the missing kdeartwork-icons an oversight, or is it not a part of the
kde-redhat?
--
Claude Jones
Bluemont, VA, USA
--__--__--
Message: 11
Message-ID: <434FEDF9.7000605@math.unl.edu>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 12:42:17 -0500
From: Rex Dieter <rdieter@math.unl.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] dependency issue on upgrade to 3.4.3
References: <200510141330.25294.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510141330.25294.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
Claude Jones wrote:
> *** Error: Missing Dependency: kdelibs = 6:3.4.2 is needed by package
> kdeartwork-icons
>
> Is the missing kdeartwork-icons an oversight, or is it not a part of the
> kde-redhat?
kdeartwork-icons-3.4.3 is in all/testing
-- Rex
--__--__--
Message: 12
From: Eli Wapniarski <eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [kde-redhat-users] dependency issue on upgrade to 3.4.3
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:48:46 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3
References: <200510141330.25294.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
In-Reply-To: <200510141330.25294.claude_jones@levitjames.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200510141948.46349.eli@orbsky.homelinux.org>
Sender: kde-redhat-users-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: General discussion for kde-redhat users \
<kde-redhat-users.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Post: <mailto:kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users>,
<mailto:kde-redhat-users-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=kde-redhat-users>
On Friday, 14 בOctober 2005 19:30, Claude Jones wrote:
> *** Error: Missing Dependency: kdelibs = 6:3.4.2 is needed by package
> kdeartwork-icons
>
> Is the missing kdeartwork-icons an oversight, or is it not a part of the
> kde-redhat?
It part of kde 3.4.3 which is already in the testing repo.
Eli
--__--__----
_______________________________________________
kde-redhat-users mailing list
kde-redhat-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/kde-redhat-users
End of kde-redhat-users Digest
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic