[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-edu-devel
Subject:    Re: Frameworks status for KDE Edu
From:       Jeremy Whiting <jpwhiting () kde ! org>
Date:       2015-02-24 0:25:38
Message-ID: CADWV2K4c5V_41bG19Khqb1eDmOWwvuafrFYJFEO6j9zi7c-nBA () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


+1 sounds good to me.

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Feck <cfeck@kde.org> wrote:

> On Monday 29 December 2014 02:11:20 Christoph Feck wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 December 2014 18:38:37 Inge Wallin wrote:
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I have made a complete status review of all the applications in
> > > KDE Edu with regard to porting to KDE Frameworks 5. The result
> > > is attached to this mail in HTML format so should be easy to
> > > view. [...]
> > > 1. Artikulate, Kmplot, Kgeography, Blinken and Pairs are ported
> > > and could be merged immediately. I don't see any reason why we
> > > have to wait until there is no more kdelibs4support left before
> > > merging if the port works well. Having both a frameworks and a
> > > master branch that should not really be touched is more
> > > confusing. Are there any reason why we should not do that
> > > immediately?
> >
> > Regarding kmplot, there are issues that block a merge (from my
> > todo):
> > - fix Open after modifying document
> > - fix New not finding part
> > - fix hide status bar (by porting to QStatusBar?)
> > - fix Qt5 dragging delay
> > - fix initialGeometrySet in kmplot.cpp
> > The first two issues are related to KToolInvocation in kmplot.cpp,
> > which needs some core developer to understand and fix.
>
> These two issues are now fixed. The remaining issues are small enough
> that I plan to merge "kmplot" later this day, together with "kturtle",
> which I think is also ready to get merged. Both projects still use
> KDELibs4Support, though.
>
> Any objections?
>
> Christoph Feck (kdepepo)
> _______________________________________________
> kde-edu mailing list
> kde-edu@mail.kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu
>

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">+1 sounds good to me.</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Feck <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:cfeck@kde.org" \
target="_blank">cfeck@kde.org</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class="">On Monday 29 December 2014 02:11:20 Christoph \
Feck wrote:<br> &gt; On Saturday 27 December 2014 18:38:37 Inge Wallin wrote:<br>
&gt; &gt; Hi everybody,<br>
&gt; &gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; I have made a complete status review of all the applications in<br>
&gt; &gt; KDE Edu with regard to porting to KDE Frameworks 5. The result<br>
&gt; &gt; is attached to this mail in HTML format so should be easy to<br>
&gt; &gt; view. [...]<br>
&gt; &gt; 1. Artikulate, Kmplot, Kgeography, Blinken and Pairs are ported<br>
&gt; &gt; and could be merged immediately. I don&#39;t see any reason why we<br>
&gt; &gt; have to wait until there is no more kdelibs4support left before<br>
&gt; &gt; merging if the port works well. Having both a frameworks and a<br>
&gt; &gt; master branch that should not really be touched is more<br>
&gt; &gt; confusing. Are there any reason why we should not do that<br>
&gt; &gt; immediately?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Regarding kmplot, there are issues that block a merge (from my<br>
&gt; todo):<br>
&gt; - fix Open after modifying document<br>
&gt; - fix New not finding part<br>
&gt; - fix hide status bar (by porting to QStatusBar?)<br>
&gt; - fix Qt5 dragging delay<br>
&gt; - fix initialGeometrySet in kmplot.cpp<br>
&gt; The first two issues are related to KToolInvocation in kmplot.cpp,<br>
&gt; which needs some core developer to understand and fix.<br>
<br>
</span>These two issues are now fixed. The remaining issues are small enough<br>
that I plan to merge &quot;kmplot&quot; later this day, together with \
&quot;kturtle&quot;,<br> which I think is also ready to get merged. Both projects \
still use<br> KDELibs4Support, though.<br>
<br>
Any objections?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Christoph Feck (kdepepo)<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
kde-edu mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kde-edu@mail.kde.org">kde-edu@mail.kde.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu" \
target="_blank">https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
kde-edu mailing list
kde-edu@mail.kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-edu


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic