[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: KDE Application Server, take two
From:       Gabor Szentivanyi <G.Szentivanyi () its ! tudelft ! nl>
Date:       1999-06-17 0:41:23
[Download RAW message or body]

> > Er.. were I you, I'd get something working FIRST and THEN get commitment
> > from developers.  Great ideas for KDE are a dime a dozen (wonder how that
> > translates)... The only thing that matters in the end is working code.
> 
> KDE can provide you with a mailinglist to support your development, possibly
> some space on one of our web-sites and maybe a module in the CVS repository.

Actually that's what I meant by "commitment", and not all people
sacrificing their time and energy for the idea without knowing anything
about implementation plans and results. Thanks for interpreting my ideas
in the right way.

However, if we, few people, try to make something working,
we'd need a relatively stable KOffice snapshot with stable IDLs. I just
read on the list that avoiding Mico "bloatware" is done by hand tuning
kom.cc. This circumstances would make seamless interoperation pretty
difficult if not impossible. When are a relatively stable set of IDLs and 
language mappings to be expected?


Gabor

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]