[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: unknown .kdelnk field
From: Bavo De Ridder <bavo () ace ! ulyssis ! student ! kuleuven ! ac ! be>
Date: 1999-05-05 14:07:49
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, 05 May 1999, Stefan Taferner wrote:
>On Wed, 05 May 1999, David Faure wrote:
>[...]
>> > > > I don't think so. Makes sense to me. However, Application is still a
>> > > > misleading name. Let's call it AppBinary?
>> > >
>> > > To me binary looks like 0 and 1 .... but you're the native speaker, not me ;)
>> > >
>> > > Ok for AppBinary then ;)
>> >
>> > How about "Exec" or "Execute" ?
>> > AppBinary is still not 100% clear to me.
>>
>> No, Exec already exists and contains the command line.
>> Here we don't want the arguments. We just want the name of the application
>> "binary" (or shell!) .... ExecutablePattern ? ;) hmm...
>
>AppName
>AppFileName
Or
AppBinary -> contains only the binaryname (e.g. "kedit")
AppParam -> contains only the parameters (e.g. "-geometry 800x600")
The string to pass to kfm or a shell should than be constructed as follows:
AppBinary + " " + AppParam
BDR
>
>--Stefan
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic