[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: unknown .kdelnk field
From:       Stefan Taferner <taferner () salzburg ! co ! at>
Date:       1999-05-05 8:58:07
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 04 May 1999, David Faure wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 01:52:54PM -0400, pbrown@redhat.com wrote:
> > On Tue, 4 May 1999, David Faure wrote:
> > 
> > > But it allows to enter several entries ("netscape", "Netscape",
> > > "Communicator" (?), whatever), because it's handled like a mimetype.
> > > I think this is wrong.
> > > Let's rename this field to simply "Application", allow a single entry in
> > > it, and we're done.
> > > 
> > > Did I miss something ?
> > 
> > I don't think so.  Makes sense to me.  However, Application is still a
> > misleading name.  Let's call it AppBinary?
> 
> To me binary looks like 0 and 1 .... but you're the native speaker, not me ;)
> 
> Ok for AppBinary then ;)

How about "Exec" or "Execute" ?
AppBinary is still not 100% clear to me.

--Stefan

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]