[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-core-devel
Subject:    Re: Spell Checking in KDE4 (KSpell2)
From:       heiko.evermann () gmx ! de
Date:       2005-04-26 21:58:13
Message-ID: 200504262358.13714.heiko.evermann () gmx ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Zack,

I have had a closer look at enchant. I installed it on my computer and ran the 
test programs for it.

I think I like the approach that KDE would only have to deal with one spell 
checker that does the dispatching for us. It would keep KSpell a lot simpler.

> - lack of decision on my part as to whether I'd want to be using Enchant
> in the future. I talked a little bit to Dom about this but we never
> went ahead and coded anything. But basically the requirement on my part
> is very simple and is "Enchant can't be linking to Glib when running
> from KDE apps". From what I remember it was using only the GModule and
> codecs from Glib so I guess we could write small wrapper classes like
> ETextCodec and EModule that would be implemented both with Qt/KDE and
> Glib/GNOME specific functions and the right implementation would be
> a ./configure option.
What is the problem with Glib? Isn't GLib some kind of standard library?

Kind regards,

Heiko Evermann

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]