[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-community
Subject:    Re: [kde-community] licence policy updates
From:       Àlex Fiestas <afiestas () kde ! org>
Date:       2014-02-17 0:44:29
Message-ID: 3909642.jr3n6vh7bv () minibad
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:25:31 Michael Pyne wrote:
> I noticed that GPLv3 *is* an acceptable license for non-library code, either
> GPLv3, GPLv3+, or GPLv3 w/ Qt exceptions. GPLv2 is certainly a valid option
> but it does not appear to be mandatory.
Why is it not a good license for libraries?
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]