From kde-community  Mon Feb 17 00:44:29 2014
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C0lex?= Fiestas <afiestas () kde ! org>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:44:29 +0000
To: kde-community
Subject: Re: [kde-community] licence policy updates
Message-Id: <3909642.jr3n6vh7bv () minibad>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-community&m=139259790118708

On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:25:31 Michael Pyne wrote:
> I noticed that GPLv3 *is* an acceptable license for non-library code, either
> GPLv3, GPLv3+, or GPLv3 w/ Qt exceptions. GPLv2 is certainly a valid option
> but it does not appear to be mandatory.
Why is it not a good license for libraries?
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community